Trosper v. Bag 'N Save

Gerrard, L,

concurring.

I join fully in the majority opinion. I write separately to address two issues raised by the dissenting opinion. The dissent advances these primary contentions: that our holding unwisely expands our retaliatory discharge rule announced in Jackson v. Morris Communications Corp.1 and that the issue of retaliatory demotion should be addressed only by the Legislature. I respectfully disagree. The Legislature certainly could, if it *867chose, follow the example of other states and address the issues presented in this case, but that does not preclude this court from acting upon…