Legal Opinion

Farsdale v. Martinez

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 24, 1998No. C3-98-710PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Appellant Harold Farsdale, a bail bondsman, posted a $50,000 bond for respondent Oscar Rios Martinez. Respondent pleaded guilty to second-degree controlled substance crime but failed to appear for sentencing. Respondent was taken into custody approximately two months later. The district court thereafter ordered forfeiture of the bond, finding prejudice to the state in its expenditure of $414 to effectuate respondent’s capture and finding appellant’s efforts to apprehend respondent insufficient. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

On February 13, 1997, respondent was arrested for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. In re ShetskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. State v. MastrianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. State v. SuperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Minnesota v. Jose C. Garcia Delaharran, Griffin Bail Bonds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API