Legal Opinion
United States v. One Household Finance Check
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 26, 1991No. Civ. Nos. H-90-804 (PCD), H-90-988 (PCD). Misc. Civ. N-90-110 (PCD). No. 2:91CV00061 (PCD)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS
DORSEY, District Judge.
I. Motion to Strike
Claimant’s Motion to Strike is denied. While incorporation of the search and seizure warrant with its accompanying documentation is not the most precise nor orderly compliance with the requirement of Fed. R.Civ.P. Rule 8(e)(1), no real detriment to claimant is found nor is the pleading thereby rendered substantively deficient.
II. Objection to Order of Magistrate Judge
On application of the government, in what was originally Docket No. N-90-110, now consolidated as H-90-804, the Magistrate-Judge ordered Household Finance…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Banco Cafetero Panama, Banco Cafetero Colon, Defendants-In-Rem-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Four Million, Two Hundred Fifty-Five Thousand, Etc., United States of America v. Three Million, Six Hundred Eighty-Six Thousand, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. United States Currency in the Amount of $228,536.00, Appeal of Edward A. Parker, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. William C. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. $80,760.00 in U.S. CurrencyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1991