Legal Opinion
Wilke v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 20, 1986No. 1-1085A258PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Tammy Wilke appeals from the trial court's judgment convicting her of perjury as a class A misdemeanor. We affirm.
FACTS
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to support the verdict, on August 19, 1984, Tammy Wilke and Jack Darnell initiated a drug transaction. Wilke was attempting to sell amphetamines to Darnell for $150. According to the evidence at trial, Darnell gave Wilke $150 in cash in exchange for one and a half grams of the drug. Darnell then grabbed the cash out of her hands and fled from the scene. Wilke notified the police immediately…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Eldred J. Paternostro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Fred LambertCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Robert ChevoorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Robert Capo, Tadeusz Snacki, A/K/A "Ted Snacki", Walter SnackiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Alex King, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Daniels v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Moore v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. FieldsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- C v. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018