Legal Opinion
United States v. Tulare Lake Canal Company
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 6, 1972No. Civ. 2483PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROCKER, District Judge.
The United States brought this action for an injunction to restrain the defendant, Tulare Lake Canal Company, from delivering stored water released to it from Pine Flat Dam and Reservoir to any lands in excess of 160 acres in any one ownership unless the owner complied with the legal requirements of reclamation law.
Intervenors, Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District and the Salyer Land Company, obtained leave to intervene as parties defendant.
Defendant, Tulare Lake Canal Company, admits that stored water is being delivered to the excess land of…
2Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Tulare Lake Canal Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- General Instrument Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- United States v. Tulare Lake Canal Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Tulare Lake Canal Company, a Corporation, Defendant-Petitioner, Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District and Salyer Land Company, a Corporation, Intervenors-Defendants. United States of America v. Tulare Lake Canal Co., a Corp., and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, Intervenor-Defendant, and Salyer Land Co., a Corp., Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant. United States of America v. Tulare Lake Canal Co., a Corp., and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant, and Salyer Land Co., a Corp., Intervenor-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Tulare Lake Canal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976