Legal Opinion

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Hutton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 9, 1942No. 4-6636PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.. Appellee sued to recover the statutory-penalty provided for in § 14261, Pope’s Digest, alleging discrimination against him hy the appellant telephone company, hereinafter referred to as the company. He recovered a judgment, from which is this appeal.

Appellee operates a cafe in the city of Fayetteville called Bed Bird Dinette. On and prior' to May 26, 1939, appellee had in his place of business a coin box telephone, the use of which-could be availed of only by depositing five cents, and anyone making that deposit could use the telephone, and such use by the public was invited. On…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Fort Smith v. Department of Public UtilitiesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  2. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Lee and HannaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  3. Lee v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dobbs v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API