Legal Opinion
Hodge v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided February 19, 1946No. 7 Div. 834PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, Judge.
Appellant was convicted in the court be.low on an indictment charging the offense of ' receiving stolen property. Title 14, Sec. 338, Code 1940. The property involved was an automobile.
The insistence is made here that the evidence was not sufficient to meet the requirements of the provisions of Sec. 307, Title 15, Code 1940.
As we observed in Brown et al. v. State, 31 Ala.App. 529, 19 So.2d 88, 90: “ ‘Corroborate’ in its legal significance, as in this case applied, means to strengthen. It must be some fact or facts which will strengthen the testimony of the accomplice. It is not…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hysler v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Malachi v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- The People v. MarquisIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Zuck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- Veith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Lackey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
- Camp v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.