Legal Opinion

Loughridge v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1947No. 15740PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motions for new trial based on newly discovered evidence are addressed largely to the discretion of the trial judge, and his order refusing a new trial on such grounds will not be reversed unless it is made to appear that the trial judge has abused his discretion. No such abuse of discretion appears in this case.

No. 15740. APRIL 16, 1947.

Terrell Loughridge was convicted of murder. The judgment denying his motion for new trial was affirmed. Loughridge v.State, 201 Ga. 513 (40 S.E.2d 544). His extraordinary motion for new trial, based on newly discovered evidence, was denied, and the exception…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Frank v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Loughridge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  4. Bowman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. Howell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  2. Fulford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  3. Tanner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  4. Lord v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. James v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API