Legal Opinion

Biggerstaff v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1934No. 16435PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

We find a bill of exceptions complaining of certain questions asked of a defense witness by the state’s attorney on cross-examination, the objection to which was that by such questioning the said state’s attorney made a direct attack upon appellant for not taking the stand and denying the sale of the half gallon of whisky in question. The bill referred to further recites that said state’s attorney was permitted, in the presence of the jury, to ask several questions…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Winfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  2. Winfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Carley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Winfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API