Dunham v. Rundle
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 27, Jan. T., 1897, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. Wyoming Co., Auditor’s Report Docket, Book 2, p. 216, sustaining exceptions to auditor’s distribution, and decreeing distribution. Exception to auditor’s report decreeing distribution of a fund derived by sheriff’s sale of personal property. Before Dun-ham, P. J. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the Superior Court.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 27, Jan. T., 1897, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. Wyoming Co., Auditor’s Report Docket, Book 2, p. 216, sustaining exceptions to auditor’s distribution, and decreeing distribution. Exception to auditor’s report decreeing distribution of a fund derived by sheriff’s sale of personal property. Before Dun-ham, P. J. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the Superior Court. Errors assigned were (1) in not awarding to Dunham, Buckley. & Co. the sum of $785.50 on their execution, out of the proceeds of the sheriff’s sale of the personal property of A. Rundle; (2) in…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, J.,
On April 12,1895, E. O. Reynolds issued an execution against A. Rundle, and the sheriff by virtue thereof levied upon and took under execution a stock of general merchandise owned by the defendant. On April 18, 1895, the sheriff received two writs of testatum fieri facias from Lackawanna county in one ot' which Thomas Rundle was plaintiff, and the other in favor of Samuel Rundle, which writs were delivered to him at the same time as a fieri facias in favor of Mrs. Mary A. Rundle, the wife of the defendant. On April 19, 1895, a fieri facias in favor of Gilmore & Duffy was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- William Broadhead & Sons v. CornmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Corlies & Co. v. StanbridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
- Parys & Co.'s AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
- Pierce v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869