Legal Opinion

Frankel v. Tremont Norman Motors Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarold Baer, J.

This is an action for specific performance of an agreement transferring an automobile agency. The plaintiff relies on a written instrument dated July 23, 1959 allegedly prepared by the parties without aid of counsel. The original defenses to the action are threefold: That there were conditions precedent to the effectiveness of the agreement, to wit, the consent of the wife of the individual defendant and that the plaintiff consummate a sale of defendant’s on-hand stock of new 1959 automobiles; that the written agreement is incomplete in that it fails to provide for assumption of lease…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Mencher v. WeissNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Poel v. . Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Nichols v. NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Rossiter v. VogelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Uniroyal, Inc. v. HellerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  2. United Commodities-Greece v. Fidelity International BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Concert Radio, Inc. v. Gaf Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Nassau Chapter v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  5. In re 716 Third Avenue Holding Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API