Legal Opinion

Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 19, 1958No. Nos. 24524-24527PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HINCKS and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges.

The motion to recall the mandate and clarify the opinion and judgment is denied, the moving party to pay the costs of printing the plaintiffs’ brief. There is no merit whatsoever to the contention of the defendant Sales Affiliates, Inc. Judge Kaufman, D.C., 159 F.Supp. 582, has correctly interpreted our opinion and it needs no clarification. This is the second such motion to delay the proceedings. It is desirable that the District Court proceed forthwith in accordance with our opinion, 247 F.2d 940, filed on September 5, 1957.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc., and Helene Curtis Sales, Inc., C. v. Layden, Doing Business as South-Western Beauty Products Company, Plaintiff-Intervener v. Sales Affiliates, Inc., the Gillette Company, Skillern & Sons, Inc., and Walgreen Drug Company of Texas, Plaintiffs-Interveners v. Sales Affiliates, Inc., Sales Affiliates, Inc., the Procter & Gamble Company, Involuntary v. C. v. Layden, Doing Business as South-Western Beauty Products Company, Sales Affiliates, Inc., the Procter & Gamble Company, Involuntary v. Skillern & Sons, Inc., and Walgreen Drug Company of Texas, and the Gillette CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958