Automatic Icemaker Co. v. SUN INSURANCE OFFICE LTD.

Russell, Judge.

The insurance policy in question contains an exclusion clause as follows: “This policy does not apply: . . . (f) under coverages A and B [bodily injury], to any obligations for which the insured or any carrier as his insurer may be held liable under any workmen’s compensation, unemployment compensation or disability benefits law, or under any similar law.” Mrs. Spires, the injured employee, did as a matter of fact obtain workmen’s compensation benefits paid by the defendant in this case. Under the clear and unambiguous terms of the policy, therefore, the defendant was correct…