Legal Opinion
Seagroves v. Tennessee Board of Probation & Parole
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 25, 2002No. 01-6274PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Alvin Seagroves, a pro se Tennessee prisoner, appeals a district court order dismissing his civil rights complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and costs, Seagroves sued two named and two unnamed members of the Tennessee Board of Probation & Parole, the chairman of that Board, and the Board itself for allegedly violating his constitutional…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- William Dwight Dotson v. Reginald A. Wilkinson, Rogerico Johnson v. Margarette GheeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Seagroves v. Tennessee Board of Probation & ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- William Dwight Dotson v. Reginald A. Wilkinson, Rogerico Johnson v. Margarette GheeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003