Huggins v. State

Plaintiffs in error present three questions for us to consider, as follows:.

“1. Did the court err in denying defendant’s motion for new trial?”

“2. Where, in his argument to the jury, the State Attorney constantly appealed to racial prejudice over the objections of the defense, will such conduct entitle the defendants to a new trial?”

“3. Where the evidence, in a prosecution for assault with intent to commit murder in the first degree wholly fails to show any intent to commit murder in any of its degrees, will the verdict be sustained?”

There are nine grounds set up in motion for new trial.

There…