Legal Opinion

David Martin v. Jose Ramos

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 2019No. Court of Appeals Case 18A-SC-1648PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bailey, Judge.

Case Summary

[1] David Martin ("Martin") filed a Notice of Claim in the Allen Superior Court Small Claims Division, alleging that he had sustained physical injuries in a vehicular collision with Jose Ramos ("Ramos"). The trial court found Ramos to be 100% at fault for the collision but denied Martin damages, concluding that Martin had not established causation. Martin filed a motion to correct error, which was denied, and he now appeals. We reverse and remand.

Issues

[2] Martin presents two restated issues for review:

I. Whether expert medical testimony is unnecessary in small…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Daub v. DaubIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Noble Roman's, Inc. v. WardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Smith v. BeatyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Topp v. LeffersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Northern Indiana Public Service Company v. Josh's Lawn & Snow, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Arlington South Vet Clinic v. Kimberly Zimmerman (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Cruz v. Majestic Star Casino and Hotel, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
  4. ELLER v. STOYANDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
  5. LIN v. HST LESSEE KEYSTONE, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API