Legal Opinion

Smith v. Crigler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1868PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, C. J.

The errors assigned present no question. They are: 1. The verdict is not sustained by, but is con*517trary to, the evidence. 2. Charges Tos. 1, 2 and 3, given by the court, are not the law governing this claim or class of cases. 3. Charges Tos. 1, 2 and 3, refused by the court, are the law governing this class of cases. 4. The verdict is contrary to law. 5. The court erred in refusing to give charge To. 3, found on pages 32 and 33, as asked for by the appellant, which is the law under the evidence.

J. S. Reid, for appellant. J. C. McIntosh, for appellee.

These may' all be good causes for a new…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Temple v. LasherIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API