Legal Opinion

Carolan v. Venechanos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 15, 1932Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The evidence permitted a finding that the decedent was struck on the crosswalk when he had all but passed the truck which was being driven between the westerly rail of the south-bound track and the westerly curb of Third avenue. ■ The front left wheel of the truck was at or close to the westerly rail at the time of the impact and its rear wheels were both to the west of this rail, showing the truck in a diagonal position from northwest to southeast, thus refuting the claim of the defense that the truck was being driven on the *813south-bound track. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. . Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Cherubino v. MeenanNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Crough v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API