Legal Opinion

Spilter v. Guy

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 17, 1907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Original applications for mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

By the court.

This day came again the parties by counsel, and the court, having maturely considered the transcript of the record of the petition aforesaid and arguments of counsel, is of opinion that the petitioners have an adequate remedy by virtue of sections-86 and 83a of the Code of Virginia of 1904, and upon the authority of Eubank v. Boughton, 98 Va. 499, 36 S. E. 529, the prayer of the petitioners for a writ of mandamus js denied; and it is ordered that the respondents recover of the petitioners their-costs in their behalf expended.

Mandamus refused.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eubank v. BoughtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fleenor v. DortonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948