Legal Opinion

Rust v. Pratt

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 28, 1938No. 768; No. 769; No. 770; No. 771PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The appeals herein are dismissed (1) for the reason that the judgments sought to be reviewed are based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support them, Doyle v. Atwell, 261 U. S. 690; Cox v. Colorado, 282 U. S. 807; Woolsey v. Best, 299 U. S. 1; (2) for the want of a substantial federal question, Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78, 106, 111-114; Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U. S. 97, 105; Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U. S. 278, 285; Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U. S. 319.

Reported below: 157 Ore. 505; 72 P. 2d 533.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Brown v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Woolsey v. BestSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Taylor v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. City of Klamath Falls v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Barton v. MaxwellOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. City of Klamath Falls v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API