Legal Opinion

Harman v. Busch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 13, 2007PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Robert M. Schank appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Costello, J.), dated November 18, 2005, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him and the cross claim asserted against him by the defendant Arthur Busch on the ground that the plaintiff Gayle Harman did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Whi…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Coscia v. 938 Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Kaminsky v. WaldnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. RizzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Cedillo v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. McNulty v. BuglinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Coburn v. SamuelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Bluth v. WorldOmni Financial Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API