Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Hartville Milling Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 2000No. 22445, 22446Published

1Opinion

ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING AND/OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT

2Per curiam

Thomas Sanders and Helen Sanders (plaintiffs) filed a motion for rehearing before this court. Hartville Milling Company (Hartville) filed a motion for rehearing and alternative motion to transfer to Supreme Court of Missouri. The motions are denied. An issue in plaintiffs’ motion warrants comment in that the rationale relied on in their argument misconstrues when a judgment is final and, therefore, when post-trial motions are timely.

Plaintiffs’ motion for rehearing is directed to the part of the judgment that was reversed, the award…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. M.F.A. Central Cooperative v. HarrillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Watson v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API