Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Phalen

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County

Decided February 1, 1926No. 30Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cummins, J.,

This case comes before the court upon certiorari from a judgment entered by the magistrate upon a claim for wages. In support of the certiorari the plaintiffs in error have filed two exceptions to the justice’s record.

The first exception is to the effect that the summons issued by the magistrate was not served by the constable nearest or most convenient to the defendant. The plaintiff in error evidently relies on section 2 of the Act of March 20, 1810, 5 Sm. Laws, 161, which provides that in the institution of an action of assumpsit, the magistrate’s summons shall be “directed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steel v. LevySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Commonwealth v. LentzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  3. Gordon v. CampSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846
  4. Pollock v. IngramSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API