Pamella E. Settlegoode v. Portland Public Schools, Multnomah School District No.1 Susan Winthrop Robert Crebo Larry Whitson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The opinion in this case is amended as follows:
Slip op. 4201, Line 11:
Insert “most of’ before “the issues”
Slip op. 4201, Lines 15-16:
Delete “In other words, the section 1983 claim is both necessary and sufficient to sustain the jury’s full verdict.”
Slip op. 4205, Line 19:
Insert the following as a new footnote 6 at the end of the paragraph:
“The magistrate also granted judgment as a matter of law on Settlegoode’s Rehabilitation Act claim based on Settle-goode’s inability to write adequate IEPs. Settlegoode, CV-00-313-ST, at 25-26. There is some dispute as to which…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Burke v. RegaladoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- John Draper v. D. RosarioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Barker v. Riverside County Office of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Jennings v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Pinard v. Clatskanie School District 6JCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.