Legal Opinion

Cristman v. Peck

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1878PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of DeKalb county; the Hon. Theodore D. Murphy, Judge,presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield

The relator applied for a mandamus, based on the assumed unauthorized act of the respondents as school directors in refusing to admit her children to the school until they brought a written excuse from her for their previous absence, to compel the .directors to admit them to the school without such written excuse. There is no averment, and no ground for assuming, that the refusal to admit the relator’s children to the school, for the alleged cause, was permanent, or had reference to any other than the term being taught at the time the children neglected to bring the required excuse. That term…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Howard v. GageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kenneally v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Hall v. StauntonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Watkins v. HuffTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Williamsport v. Citizens' Water & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. People Ex Rel. Endicott v. HuddlestonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API