Legal Opinion

Midland Bank v. Rieke

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 1, 1993No. 68,613PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.:

Defendants, Lawrence and Dana Rieke, appeal from entry of a default decree of foreclosure against them and an order denying their motion to set aside the default judgment.

They allege they were entitled to notice of the default hearing under the provisions of K.S.A. 60-255(a) due to contacts they had with plaintiff and plaintiff’s counsel during the pendency of the action and that the trial court abused its discretion by denying their motion to set aside the default judgment under K.S.A. 60-260. We affirm.

On March 1, 1991, Lawrence and Dana Rieke executed a promissory note with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Hutchinson National Bank & Trust Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1988
  3. Neagle v. BrooksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Bazine State Bank v. Pawnee Production Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  5. Automatic Feeder Co. v. TobeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Management, Inc. v. Topeka Investment Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  2. In the Matter of TalleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API