Legal Opinion

Winegar v. Springville City

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided January 16, 2014No. 20120898-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROTH, Judge:

1 1 Wade S. Winegar and Sandra Winegar appeal from the district court's grant of summary judgment to Springville City (the City). The Winegars contend that summary judgment was improper because the City failed to demonstrate that the Winegars' lawsuit was untimely under the Utah Governmental Immunity Act. We vacate the entry of summary judgment and remand to the district court.

BACKGROUND 1

T2 The Winegars owned a vacant wooded parcel along Hobble Creek in Springville, Utah. In May 2005, the City decided that it needed to clear obstructions from the Hobble Creek streambed.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Wheeler v. McPhersonUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Basic Research, LLC v. Admiral Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. CristobalCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  5. State v. PullmanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shiozawa v. DukeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  2. Kirton McConkie PC v. ASC Utah LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  3. Rachel Chua v. Neuromonitoring Associates, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2026
  4. Taber v. Cascade Designs IncoporatedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
  5. Winegar v. Springville CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API