Gelineau v. Johnson
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
PAUL L. MALONEY, Chief Judge.
Before the court is Plaintiffs’ second motion for injunctive relief regarding the Libertarian Party’s presence on the ballot in Michigan’s rapidly approaching presidential election. In their first motion, Plaintiffs — the Libertarian Party of Michigan; Gary E. Johnson, the party’s backup candidate for President; and William Gelineau, a Michigan citizen — sought to force Michigan’s Secretary of State to include Gary E. Johnson on the ballot as the Libertarian Party’s nominee for President. (ECF No. 3.) This…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New PartySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bush v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Michael Gonzales v. National Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- McPherson v. BlackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless & Service Employees International Union, Local 1199 v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Faas v. CascosDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
- Charles Ballard v. Ohio Secretary of State, et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026