Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Lawyer

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1936No. Crim. 1870PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Appeal from an order denying petition for a writ of error coram nobis. Appellant was tried and convicted on an information charging grand theft—stealing a cow. That judgment was affirmed. (People v. Lawyer, 1 Cal. App. (2d) 1 [35 Pac. (2d) 1036].) He made a motion to set aside the judgment, which was denied. That order was affirmed. (People v. Lawyer, 9 Cal. App. (2d) 69 [48 Pac. (2d) 722].)

On the appeal now before us his contention is that he was denied due process of law “in so far as the cow was and is concerned”, the argument being that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. People v. LawyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. People v. LawyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. CoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. People v. McConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. People v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. In Re DorseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API