Legal Opinion
In Re Convisser
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 15, 1925No. 4507PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
6 F.2d 177 (1925)
In re CONVISSER.
NEWMAN
v.
CLAUSSEN.
No. 4507.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 15, 1925.
Edgar C. Levey, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Brownstone & Goodman, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before HUNT, RUDKIN, and McCAMANT, Circuit Judges.
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
As already stated, the case is before this court both on appeal and on petition for revision, and the parties have discussed the testimony as though the case were properly here on appeal. But it is well settled that the order in question is an administrative order…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of LovingSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Scholle v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- In re MuellerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
- Dubois v. SpinksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Australia v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Markwell & Co. v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Barry v. Lawrence Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Markwell & Co. v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Markwell & Co. v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940