Legal Opinion

New York, N. H. & H. R. Co. v. Cockcroft

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut

Decided February 2, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application to Assess Value of Lands to be taken by a railroad company. Heard on demurrer to the plea in abatement.

1Opinion of the Court

Wheeler, District Judge.

By the statutes of the state railroad companies appear to have the right to take additional lands for railroad purposes, and to locate, abandon, or change depots or stations, upon the consent of tho railroad commissioners, filed in tho town-clerk’s office, and payment or tender of damages ascertained on application to a judge of the superior court. And by section 3518 of tho General Statutes, as amended by the Public Acts of 1889, p. 129, a person aggrieved by any order of the railroad commissioners upon any proceeding relative to the location, abandonment, or changing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Luther v. BordenSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  2. Randall v. BrighamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Claiborne County v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Post v. SupervisorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Town of Venice v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Venner v. Great Northern Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907
  2. White v. WassonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Kwik Loc Corporation v. Matthews International CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API