Legal Opinion

Stephenson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 29, 1992No. A92A1153PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

Stephenson’s sole challenge to his conviction for trafficking in cocaine, OCGA § 16-13-31, is that court-appointed trial counsel was constitutionally deficient under state and federal standards.

Only the Sixth Amendment right was invoked and ruled on below, so the benefit of counsel guaranteed by the state constitution, 1983 Ga. Const., Art. I, Sec. I, Par. XIV, is not before us. White v. State, 174 Ga. App. 699, 701 (3) (331 SE2d 72) (1985). In addition, appellant makes no independent argument regarding the state constitution and cites no state authority. He relies exclusively…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Nix v. WhitesideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  4. Mosier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Rowland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API