Legal Opinion
Orcutt v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 12, 1931No. A-7979PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Tulsa county of the crime of robbery with firearms, and his punishment fixed by the jury at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for ten years.
The only question presented in this appeal is that of former jeopardy.
The facts so far as the question of former jeopardy is concerned are that this defendant, together with Lester Garvin and Peewee Wilson, forced W. K. Cottrell and W. E. Sturdevant to drive Cottrell’s automobile out southeast of the city of Tulsa a few miles and there compelled them at the point…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gunter v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- People v. MajorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- In re AllisonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Morris v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Estep v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Davenport v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. HallIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. FredlundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Wilburn Rollo Mansfield v. Ron ChampionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Collins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.