Gollihar v. State

Opinion by

Justice GRANT.

On remand from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, we have been directed by that Court to address the remaining points of error in a manner not inconsistent with its opinion. In reversing our judgment, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals stated that its purpose was to coalesce “questions of legal sufficiency of the evidence and how it is measured, variance law, and the law relating to surplus-age.” Gollihar v. State, 46 S.W.3d 243, 245 (Tex.Crim.App.2001).

Douglas Gollihar appeals from his conviction for stealing a go-kart valued at less than $1,500. We originally…