Legal Opinion

United States v. Joel Rosenberg

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 15, 1958No. 12554_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

For a second time in the course of this litigation we must determine whether withholding from the defendant certain data, which defense counsel had asked the government to surrender for inspection and possible use in the cross-examination of witnesses, has amounted to reversible error under the principles announced in Jencks v. United States, 1957, 353 U.S. 657, 77 S.Ct. 1007, 1 L.Ed.2d 1103. On the first appeal we set aside appellant Rosenberg’s conviction, holding that the “failure of the trial judge to permit counsel for the defendant to inspect at the trial the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. Joel RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  3. United States v. GrossmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1957

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. United States v. Joseph CovelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Marvin Jose RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. Newell Chilton Sells v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  5. West v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API