Legal Opinion

Genord v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 14, 2006No. 04-2486PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILMAN, Circuit Judge.

The named gynecologists sued Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan, alleging that Blue Cross had fraudulently denied their claims in violation of both the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c), and various state laws. Blue Cross moved for dismissal on the ground that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the civil RICO action was “reverse preempted” by Michigan law in accordance with a provision of a federal statute commonly known as the McCarran-Ferguson Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1012. The district court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Union Labor Life Insurance v. PirenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States Department of Treasury v. FabeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Amsouth Bank (03-5517) First Tennessee Bank (03-5521) v. George DaleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  5. Joseph J. Simon v. Pfizer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Title Insurance Antitrust CasesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
  2. Genord v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. Texas Mutual Insurance Company, Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, Tasb Risk Management Fund, Transportation Insurance Company, Truck Insurance Exchange, Twin City Fire Insurance Company, Valley Forge Insurance Company v. Phi Air Medical, LLCTexas Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API