Legal Opinion · Dissent

Martin v. Witty

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1904Published

Appeal from Scotland Circuit Court. — Hon. E. B. McKee, Judge. (1) Tlie contract in evidence provided that the five hundred dollars was to be paid upon a certain date, tqwit: the first day of May, 1901, this being the case, it was an independent and absolute promise to pay the amount on that date.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Scotland Circuit Court. — Hon. E. B. McKee, Judge. (1) Tlie contract in evidence provided that the five hundred dollars was to be paid upon a certain date, tqwit: the first day of May, 1901, this being the case, it was an independent and absolute promise to pay the amount on that date. Overton v. Curd, 8 Mo. 420; Portage v. Cole, 1 Saunders 320, note 1. (2) When (as in this case), the promises of both parties are absolute and independent of each other, upon a breach of his promise by one party, the other may sue him without averring that he has performed his own promise and it is…

1DissentGoode, J.

The decision of this • case, in my opinion, turns principally on the fact that the contract sued on was not delivered to either of the obligees, but was deposited with the Farmers Exchange Bank. If a contract is delivered to the obligee it takes effect at once as a complete contract, no matter what parol conditions were attached to it and these' can not be shown. Price v. Ins. Co., 54 Mo. App. 119; Cox v. Parker, 49 N. Y. 107; Brayman v. Bingham, 26 N. Y. 483; *269Miller v. Fletcher, 27 Gratt. 403. But if instead of being delivered to the obligee, a contract is deposited with a third party, it is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Braman v. . BinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Cocks v. . BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Beall v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1867
  4. Price v. Home InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API