Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Chicago

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 21, 1971No. 33-70Published

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs, as distributees of the estate of Hugh A. Foresman, contend that the estate incurred selling expenses of $24,500 in connection with the sale of certain securities, which expenses were used as a reduction from the gross amount received from the sale of the securities in determining gain or loss on the 1960 fiduciary income tax return. In 1964 the executor of the estate filed a claim for refund relative to the 1960 fiduciary return, by which claim the executor, inter alia, deducted the $24,500 sales expense as an administrative expense. In 1967 the Chicago District Director of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Charles Ilfeld Co. v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Bray v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
  4. Ford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Ford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API