Legal Opinion

DeMarco v. DeMarco

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 13, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The summary judgment of the Law Division dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Josephine DeMarco against her mother defendant Mary DeMarco is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Winkelstein in his written opinion of November 10, 1992 reported at 274 N.J.Super. 257, 643 A.2d 1053 (Law Div.). We are satisfied from our study of the record and the arguments presented that defendant is shielded by parental immunity. See Foldi v. Jeffries, 93 N.J. 533, 551, 461 A.2d 1145 (1983). We are also satisfied that summary judgment was the appropriate procedure to be employed. Judson v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Foldi v. JeffriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. DeMarco v. DeMarcoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thorpe v. WigganNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  2. NOBREGA v. TROY-BILTDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API