Harris v. State

CONFESSION OF ERROR

As the state appropriately concedes, the appellant’s conviction for direct criminal contempt because of an improper remark he allegedly made to the trial judge must be reversed because of the court’s failure to adhere to the provisions of Florida Rule *69of Criminal Procedure 3.830. Accord Patz v. State, 691 So.2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).