Legal Opinion

Fisse v. Katzentine

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1884No. 11,038PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Prom the Howard Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Colerick, C.

— This was an action upon a written undertaking executed by the appellants in an action of replevin brought by the appellees against the appellant Fisse. It was given to- enable Fisse to retain the possession of the property in controversy in said action during its pendency, as authorized in such cases by the statute. The complaint in this action, after reciting that the-appellees had commenced an action against said Fisse in the Howard Circuit Court, to replevy a certain stock of tailoring goods, the seizure of the property, and the execution of said written undertaking, a copy…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pate v. TaitIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Deming v. FerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Burkhart v. MerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Montgomery v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  2. Post v. CecilIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API