Legal Opinion

In re J.M.D.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 15, 2011No. COA10-1001PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

Respondent-mother appeals from the permanency planning order entered after this Court reversed a previous order and remanded the matter to the trial court. Respondent-mother contends that the trial court ignored this Court’s mandate by failing to allow her to present evidence and by refusing to make findings addressing the factors listed in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-907(b) (2009). We reverse the trial court’s order entered upon remand, and remand the case for entry of an order consistent with this opinion.

*421We previously summarized the procedural history of this case in more detail in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. North Carolina National Bank v. Virginia Carolina BuildersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. In Re HartonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Couch v. Private Diagnostic ClinicCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Buncombe County Department of Social Services v. LedbetterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Hendricks v. SanksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fairfield v. WakeMedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. In re I.K.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. In re P.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. In re S.M.M.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
  5. In re S.M.M.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API