Legal Opinion
In re Farley
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1914Published
Proceeding to cancel and revoke a liquor tax certificate.
1Opinion of the CourtHendrick, J.
The facts here are not in dispute. There was issued to one Fanny Mehlsak a liquor tax certificate, No. 4638, for premises No. 394 First avenue, New York city, for the excise year commencing October 1,1912, and ending September 30,1913. In March of 1914 the state commissioner of excise commenced a proceeding against Fanny Mehlsak to revoke the cer*260tificate No. 4638 for a violation of the Excise Law, alleged to have been committed on September 26 and 27, 1913, in that she permitted the premises No. 394 First avenue to become disorderly on those days. The proceeding resulted in the revocation of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Miller v. . LymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- People ex rel. A. Hupfel's Sons v. CullinanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- In re FarleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- In re the Petition of CullinanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Matter of CullinanNew York Court of Appeals · 1906