Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Rubin

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 1963No. Crim. 8649PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.

In each of five counts of an information the defendant was charged with the crime of issuing a check without sufficient funds in violation of section 476a of the Penal Code. In a trial by jury the defendant was found guilty as charged in the first four counts. The fifth count was dismissed. The punishment imposed was imprisonment in the state prison for the term prescribed by law. The defendant has appealed from the judgment.

A summary of the evidence will be given. With respect to the first count, Rosalie Mielcarz testified on behalf of the People. She was a teller in the main office of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. DitsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. YrigoyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. DaymusArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  4. People v. PryorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. People v. GriffithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Henry Bessesen and Buni BessesenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  2. People v. PoyetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. NorthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. First National Bank v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  5. The First National Bank Of Decatur v. Insurance Company Of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API