LaRose v. Curoe
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
LARSON, Justice.
A summary judgment was entered against defendant Curoe, based upon two promissory notes payable to the plaintiff LaRose. On appeal, Curoe contends the district court erred initially in overruling his special appearance, which had asserted his immunity from service of original notice, and then in granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff. We conclude the court lacked personal jurisdiction and reverse and remand for entry of an order sustaining the special appearance. Under this disposition, it is unnecessary to address the summary judgment issue.
These parties at one…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lamb v. SchmittSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mullen v. SanbornCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
- Tice v. WILMINGTON CHEMICAL CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Miller v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
- Murray v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cross v. Lightolier Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Cefis v. CefisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996