Legal Opinion

(HC) Deary-Smith v. Bonta

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 8, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00572Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RASHID DESHAWN DEARY-SMITH, No. 2:20-cv-00572 GGH P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 STUART SHERMAN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner paid the filing fee. 20 Rule 2 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases provides that the petition: “shall 21 specify all the grounds for relief which are available to the petitioner and of which he has or by 22 the exercise of reasonable…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Raymond Edward Middleton v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. John K. Lincoln v. Franklin Y.K. SunnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Cesar Ramirez Gutierrez v. Bertram S. Griggs, Superintendent, California Institution for Men at ChinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API