Legal Opinion
Banking & Trading Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 8, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
Defendant moves for leave to amend its answer to include the defense that plaintiff lacks capacity to sue, and for an order dismissing the complaint on the same grounds. Defendant on oral argument abandoned its previous contention that this Court lacks jurisdiction and no longer seeks to raise this question as a defense.
Plaintiff, alleging that it was a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of Indonesia, commenced this action on July 2, 1950 against the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to recover for the alleged breach of a contract made by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coburn v. ColemanDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1947
- Kucharski v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- Princeton Textile Printing Corp. v. Walter Peek Paper Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1949
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alabama Power Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Chavez v. KitschNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Young v. PattridgeDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1966
- Conlan Abu v. DicksonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023