Legal Opinion

Cincinnati v. Bawtenheimer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1990No. Case No. C-890609Published

1Per curiam

This cause came on to be heard upon the appeal, the transcript of the docket, journal entries and original papers from the Hamilton County Municipal Court, the transcript of the proceedings, and the briefs. The court has sua sponte removed the case from the accelerated calendar.

The city's sole assignment of error is that the trial court erred in granting the defendantappellee's motion to dismiss the charge alleging that he violated Cincinnati Municipal Code Section 311-99(e), which makes it a first-degree misdemeanor for a person to refuse to permit the tax commissioner; or the agents of that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API