Greenblatt v. Mendelsohn
City of New York Municipal Court
Motion by the defendant to open a default and to vacate a judgment, and for an order of restitution of money obtained under the judgment.
1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.
In May, 1904, the plaintiff David Greenblatt commenced this action against Leo Frankel to recover the value of goods sold and delivered by the firm of Mendelsohn and Weisholz, who were the plaintiff’s assignors. On the 15th of May, 1904, Herman T. Mendelsohn was, by an order of the Supreme Court, appointed receiver of the goods, chattels and credits of the firm of Mendelsohn and Weisholz, and duly qualified as- such receiver. On May 25, 1904, Mendelsohn, as receiver, commenced an action against Frankel to recover .$193.33, having previously been duly authorized to commence the action.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clark v. . MosherNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Fleischmann v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Windecker v. Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Jacobs v. LiebermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Talman v. BarnesNew York Supreme Court · 1834
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Manacher v. Sterling National Bank & Trust Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1967
- Cross & Brown Co. v. Ludin Realty Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1915
- Reiffin v. Independent Order Brith AbrahamCity of New York Municipal Court · 1932