Legal Opinion

State v. Presock

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 21, 2016No. CF130777; A158073PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShorr, J.

This case presents a single legal question for our consideration: whether a probationer has a due process right under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution to review his probation file for potential mitigating evidence when the contents of that file are not being used as evidence against him in a proceeding to potentially revoke his probation. We conclude that the United States Supreme Court case law interpreting the Fourteenth Amendment in this context does not support the existence of such a right. As a result, we affirm the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RockafellorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. State v. RockafellorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API